Hotel Rwanda Viewing Guide Answers offers a comprehensive analysis of the critically acclaimed film that shines a light on the tragic events of the Rwandan Genocide. This guide provides a detailed exploration of the film’s historical context, characterization, themes, cinematography, and its profound impact on raising awareness and promoting reconciliation.
Through an engaging narrative, this guide delves into the historical backdrop of the genocide, examining the role of the Rwandan Patriotic Front and the Interahamwe militia. It analyzes the motivations and actions of key characters, such as Paul Rusesabagina and Colonel Oliver, highlighting their contrasting perspectives and the moral dilemmas they face.
Historical Context
The film “Hotel Rwanda” depicts the horrific events of the Rwandan Genocide, which occurred in 1994. The genocide was a systematic and intentional killing of Tutsi people by Hutu extremists. The film focuses on the Hôtel des Mille Collines in Kigali, which became a sanctuary for over 1,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu refugees during the genocide.
The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) and the Interahamwe Militia
The RPF was a Tutsi rebel group that had been fighting against the Hutu-dominated government of Rwanda since 1990. The Interahamwe was a Hutu extremist militia that was responsible for carrying out much of the violence during the genocide.
Timeline of Key Events
- 1990: The RPF launches an invasion of Rwanda from Uganda.
- 1994: The Rwandan Genocide begins after the assassination of President Juvénal Habyarimana.
- 1994: The RPF captures Kigali and ends the genocide.
Character Analysis
Paul Rusesabagina
Paul Rusesabagina was the manager of the Hôtel des Mille Collines. He is portrayed as a courageous and resourceful man who risked his life to protect the refugees in his hotel. He used his connections with the Hutu government and the Interahamwe to negotiate safe passage for the refugees and to prevent them from being killed.
Colonel Oliver
Colonel Oliver was the leader of the Interahamwe militia. He is portrayed as a ruthless and sadistic man who is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Tutsi people. He is determined to kill all the Tutsi refugees in the Hôtel des Mille Collines, but Paul Rusesabagina is able to outsmart him and save the refugees.
Comparison of Paul and Colonel Oliver, Hotel rwanda viewing guide answers
Paul Rusesabagina and Colonel Oliver are two very different men. Paul is a courageous and compassionate man who is willing to risk his life to save others. Colonel Oliver is a ruthless and sadistic man who is responsible for the deaths of thousands of people.
The contrast between these two men highlights the horrors of the Rwandan Genocide and the importance of courage and compassion in the face of adversity.
Themes and Symbolism: Hotel Rwanda Viewing Guide Answers
Themes
- Courage
- Resilience
- The horrors of war
Symbolism
- The Hôtel des Mille Collines as a sanctuary
- The machete as a symbol of violence
How Themes and Symbolism Contribute to the Film’s Message
The themes and symbolism in the film “Hotel Rwanda” contribute to its overall message about the horrors of war and the importance of courage and compassion. The film shows how even in the darkest of times, there are people who are willing to risk their lives to save others.
It also shows how the horrors of war can have a lasting impact on the lives of those who survive.
Commonly Asked Questions
What is the significance of the hotel in the film?
The Hôtel des Mille Collines served as a sanctuary for over 1,200 Tutsi refugees during the genocide, providing them with protection and a glimmer of hope amidst the chaos.
How does the film portray the role of international intervention?
The film criticizes the inaction of the international community, particularly the United Nations, in preventing the genocide and highlights the devastating consequences of their failure to respond.
What are the key themes explored in the film?
Hotel Rwanda explores themes of courage, resilience, humanity, and the horrors of war. It examines the moral choices individuals make in the face of adversity and the profound impact of violence on both victims and perpetrators.
